Standifer Henderson v. Viamedia, Inc.
Filing
29
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 28 Report and Recommendations, 16 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Viamedia, Inc. Viamedia, Inc.s Traditional and No-Evidence Motion or Summary Judgment [Doc. #16] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 1/17/14. (cm, )
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
TRACI STANDIFER-HENDERSON,
Plaintiff,
V.
VIAMEDIA, INC.,
Defendant.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:12cv636
Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636. On December 13, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Viamedia, Inc.’s Traditional and NoEvidence Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #16] be denied.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Viamedia, Inc.’s Traditional and No-Evidence Motion
1
for Summary Judgment [Doc. #16] is DENIED.
17
So ORDERED and SIGNED on January ____, 2014.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?