Harris et al v. U.S. Bank National Association

Filing 51

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 40 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by US Bank National Association, 44 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 4/27/15. (cm, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION MICHAEL S. HARRIS and STEPHANIE J. HARRIS, Plaintiffs, v. § § § § § U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION § AS TRUSTEE FOR CSFB MORTGAGE § BACKED PASSTHROUGH CERTIFICATES, § SERIES 2004-AR2, § Defendant. § CIVIL NO. 4:12-cv-00696 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On February 26, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant U.S. Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 40) be GRANTED in its entirety for Defendant, that Plaintiffs take nothing by their claims, that Defendant be awarded its costs, and that this matter be closed on the court’s docket. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Defendant U.S. Bank’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 1 40) is GRANTED in its entirety for Defendant, and Plaintiffs shall take nothing by their claims. Further, Defendant shall be awarded its costs, and this matter shall be closed on the court’s docket. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 27th day of April, 2015. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?