Loza-Gracia v. USA

Filing 22

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Alberto Loza-Gracia, 17 Report and Recommendation. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his propo sed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Movant to the Report, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conc lusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections of Movant are without merit. It is accordingly ORDERED that Movant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (#12) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 4/7/2014. (kls, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ALBERTO LOZA-GRACIA, #62723-079 versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-699 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:09-CR-152(1) ORDER The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Amos L. Mazzant, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Movant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings should be denied. Movant has filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Movant to the Report, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections of Movant are without merit. It is accordingly ORDERED that Movant’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (#12) is DENIED. . SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of April, 2014. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?