Ruelas v. Wal-Mart in its Assumed or Common Name et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE denying 5 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Adelaida Ruelas. Ordered that Tom Barela be dismissed as improperly joined. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/7/2013. (pad, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
WAL-MART IN ITS ASSUMED NAME
OR COMMON NAME INCLUDING
WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, L.P.,
WAL-MART STORES INC., and
WAL-MART STORES TEXAS, LLC
CASE NO. 4:12cv729
Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On January 30, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Doc. #5] be denied, and
that Tom Barela be dismissed as improperly joined.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Doc. #5] is DENIED.
It is further ORDERED that Tom Barela is DISMISSED with prejudice as improperly joined.
So ORDERED and SIGNED on March _____, 2013.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?