Martinez v Foster, et al
Filing
162
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - Therefore, Defendant Jagdish A. Shah's Unopposed Rule 54(b) Motion for Entry of Final Judgment (Dkt. 154 ) is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 6/21/2017. (baf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
MARIA GUADALUPE MARTINEZ,
Individually, as a Legal Representative of the
Estate of DELFINO GARCIA, and Next
Friend of GEMMA GARCIA, a Minor,
GRETCHELL GARCIA, a Minor, DELFINO
GARCIA, JR., a Minor, and DELIA
MACEDO, Next Friend of EMELY
PARTICIA GARCIA,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DONNIE FOSTER, COMMUNITY
EDUCATION CENTERS, INC., JAGDISH
A. SHAH, and JOHN DOES #1
THROUGH #35,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:13CV59
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action
(Dkt. 159), this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 24, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered
containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Jagdish A. Shah’s
Unopposed Rule 54(b) Motion for Entry of Final Judgment (Dkt. 154) should be GRANTED.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the court.
1
Therefore, Defendant Jagdish A. Shah’s Unopposed Rule 54(b) Motion for Entry of Final
Judgment (Dkt. 154) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 21st day of June, 2017.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?