LN v. Denton County Special Education Cooperative et al

Filing 47

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 46 Report and Recommendations,, DENYING 35 Motion to Strike filed by Krum Independent School District, DENYING 32 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by LN, GRANTING 27 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Krum Independent School District. The court further ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 9/17/2014. (baf, )

Download PDF
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION C.P., and her parent and next friend, L.N., Plaintiff, V. KRUM INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 4:13cv63 Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 6, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Krum Independent School District’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #27] be granted, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #32] be denied, and Krum Independent School District’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Response to the District’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #35] be denied. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. 1 It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant Krum Independent School District’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #27] is GRANTED, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #32] is DENIED, and Krum Independent School District’s Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Response to the District’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record [Doc. #35] is DENIED. The court further ORDERS that this case is dismissed with prejudice. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 17 day of September, 2014. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?