Warwick-Drake et al v. McDonald et al
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER REMANDING CASE for 11 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 10 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Liane Warwick-Drake, Christopher Warwick-Drake. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 12/17/2013. (baf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER WARWICK-DRAKE
AND LIANE WARWICK-DRAKE,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Plaintiffs,
v.
RICHARD MCDONALD
AND MCEQUINE ENTERPRISE, LLC
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 4:13-cv-00342
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AND ORDER REMANDING CASE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On August 19, 2013, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Dkt. 10) be GRANTED
and that this case be remanded to the 397th Judicial District Court of Grayson County, Texas for
further proceedings.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court.
1
Therefore, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Dkt. 10) is GRANTED and this case is hereby
REMANDED to the 397th Judicial District Court of Grayson County, Texas for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 17th day of December, 2013.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?