Fiedler, et al v. IRS Advisory Group et al
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 21 Report and Recommendation. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs' case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/7/2015. (kls, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
MURIEL G. FIEDLER and
ROBERT FIEDLER
§
§
§
§
§
§
V.
IRS ADVISORY GROUP, ET AL.
CASE NO. 4:13cv391
(Judge Mazzant)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On November 13, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiffs' case be dismissed without prejudice for failure
to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the Court.
.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs' case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure
to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
All relief not previously granted is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
SIGNED this 7th day of January, 2015.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?