United States of America v. $445,633.74 in United States Currency
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - GRANTING 7 Motion for Entry of Default filed by United States of America, 9 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 9/29/2014. (baf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
§
§
§
§
§
§
v.
$445,633.74 IN UNITED STATES
CURRENCY
NO. 4:13CV422
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On February 3, 3014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that the United States’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt.
7) be GRANTED, that a judgment of forfeiture be entered in favor of the United States, that all right,
title, and interest in the Defendant property be vested in the United States, and that the Defendant
property be disposed of according to law.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court. Therefore, the United States’ Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 7) is GRANTED, and
a judgment of forfeiture shall be entered in favor of the United States finding that all right, title, and
1
interest in the Defendant property is vested in the United States and the Defendant property shall be
disposed of according to law.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 29th day of September, 2014.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?