Uselton v. Commissioner SSA
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, for 33 Report and Recommendation. Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the Court hereby adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED for further review. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 9/26/2016. (kls, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
GINA L. USELTON,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY.
§
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 4:13-CV-551
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
§
§
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On September 2, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #33) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the final decision of the Commissioner of
Social Security (“Commissioner”) be REMANDED.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having
been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge are correct, and the Court hereby adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the
. Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is REMANDED for
further review.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 26th day of September, 2016.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?