Obey v. Frisco Medical Center L.L.P. et al

Filing 89

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 79 Report and Recommendations, DENYING 41 Motion to Dismiss, filed by William Keaton, Karen Murchison, Dale Burleson, Keith Matheny, James Laferney, Frisco Medical Center L.L.P., DENYING 45 Motion to Dismiss filed by Colleen Wooldridge. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/7/15. (cm, )

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION

SHAWANDA RENEE OBEY, M.D.

§
§
V.
§
§
FRISCO MEDICAL CENTER L.L.P. d/b/a
§
BAYLOR MEDICAL CENTER AT FRISCO, §
ET AL.

CASE NO. 4:13cv656
(Judge Mazzant)

§

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On December 2, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants Frisco Medical Center L.L.P. d/b/a Baylor
Medical Center at Frisco, William Keaton, Dr. Jimmy Laferney, Dr. Dale Burleson, Dr. Keith
Matheny, and Karen Murchison’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt.
#41) and Defendant Colleen Wooldridge, CRNA’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended
Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) (Dkt. #45) be denied.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants Frisco Medical Center L.L.P. d/b/a Baylor
Medical Center at Frisco, William Keaton, Dr. Jimmy Laferney, Dr. Dale Burleson, Dr. Keith
Matheny, and Karen Murchison’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Dkt.
#41) is DENIED.

.

It is further ORDERED that Defendant Colleen Wooldridge, CRNA’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) (Dkt. #45) is DENIED.
SIGNED this 7th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2