Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Victoria et al
Filing
5
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRANTING 3 Motion to Remand to State Court, filed by Wells Fargo Bank NA, 4 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 2/20/2014. (baf, )
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANN VICTORIA, BALIENTE VICTORIA,
and ALL OCCUPANTS,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 4:13cv683
(Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant)
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636. On January 14, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Doc. #3] be
granted and the case remanded to County Court at Law No. 3 of Collin County, Texas.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Doc. #3] is granted, and
this case is remanded to County Court at Law No. 3 of Collin County, Texas.
1
All motions by either party not previously ruled on are DENIED.
20
So ORDERED and SIGNED on February ____, 2014.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?