Tate v. Paris Junior College et al

Filing 84

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 78 Report and Recommendation. This court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's recommendations as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, this case shall be dismissed with prejudice and closed on the court's docket. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 11/5/2015. (kls, )

Download PDF
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION EBONEE TATE Plaintiff, VS. PARIS JUNIOR COLLEGE, SEAN LEBEAUF and DR. PAM ANGLIN Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § Case No. 4:13cv737 (Judge Clark/Judge Bush) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On October 1, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that this case be dismissed with prejudice and closed on the court’s docket with all costs to be borne by the party incurring same. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, this case shall be dismissed with prejudice and closed on the court’s docket. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 5 day of November, 2015. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?