Hurlston V. City of Princeton, Texas, et al

Filing 132

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 126 Report and Recommendations, GRANTING 90 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by City of Kyle, Texas, City of Princeton, Texas. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants City of Princeton, Texas, and City of Kyle,Texas Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #90) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs claims against City of Princeton, Texas, and City of Kyle, Texas, are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/19/2016. (baf, )

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION

DR. GLEN W. HURLSTON
v.
CITY OF PRINCETON, TEXAS, ET AL.

§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 4:13-CV-757
(Judge Mazzant)

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On December 11, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered (Dkt. #126) containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ City of Princeton, Texas, and
City of Kyle, Texas (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #90) be
granted. On December 28, 2015, Plaintiff, represented by counsel, filed a Motion for Extension
of Time to File Response as to Report and Recommendation (Dkt. # 127).

On

December 29, 2015, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Response
as to Report and Recommendation, and ordered Plaintiff to file his objections to the report of the
Magistrate Judge on or before January 8, 2016 (Dkt. #128). No objections to the Magistrate
Judge’s report have since been filed.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having
been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the
Court.

.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants’ City of Princeton, Texas, and City of Kyle,
Texas Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #90) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against
City of Princeton, Texas, and City of Kyle, Texas, are DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 19th day of January, 2016.

___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2