Wood et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 7 Motion to Dismiss, filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 9 Report and Recommendations. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #7] is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 4/20/14. (cm, )
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JOHNNY A. WOOD and
SUZETTE E. WOOD,
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and
CASE NO. 4:14cv34
Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636. On March 24, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s
Motion to Dismiss [Doc. #7] be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Motion to
Dismiss [Doc. #7] is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 20 day of April, 2014.
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?