BAILEY, TRUSTEE v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al

Filing 11

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and ORDER granting 10 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/31/2015. (pad, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION HAROLD E. BAILEY, TRUSTEE § § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, VS. BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, L.P., THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, and RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A. Defendants. Case No. 4:14cv147 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On March 17, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that this case be dismissed with prejudice. No objections were timely filed. On June 19, 2014, Plaintiff filed his Motion to Strike Complaint (Dkt. 6), indicating that he had reached an agreement with Defendants and requesting that the case be dismissed. No response has been filed in opposition. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Further, there being no objection to Plaintiff’s request for dismissal and in accordance 1 with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Plaintiff’s motion (Dkt. 10) is GRANTED. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice and the matter is closed on the court’s docket with each party bearing its own costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 31st day of March, 2015. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?