United States of America v. Gray et al
Filing
38
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 30 Motion for Default Judgment,. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/31/2015. (pad, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOYCE GRAY, individually, and as Executrix
of the ESTATE OF J.L. GRAY,
Defendants, and
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, NORTHERN
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK and
MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, IPFS
CORPORATION dba IMPERIAL CREDIT
CORPORATION, TEXAS WORKFORCE
COMMISSION,
Defendants (who may claim an interest
in the realty sought to be foreclosed).
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:14-cv-00206
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On August 25, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that the United States of America’s Motion for Default
Judgment (Dkt. 30) be GRANTED and that the Final Default Judgment attached to Plaintiff’s
motion, see Dkt. 30-2, be entered for Plaintiff.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
1
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court. Therefore, the United States of America’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 30) is
GRANTED and a final default judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 31st day of March, 2015.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?