United States of America v. Gray et al

Filing 38

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 30 Motion for Default Judgment,. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/31/2015. (pad, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOYCE GRAY, individually, and as Executrix of the ESTATE OF J.L. GRAY, Defendants, and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK and MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, IPFS CORPORATION dba IMPERIAL CREDIT CORPORATION, TEXAS WORKFORCE COMMISSION, Defendants (who may claim an interest in the realty sought to be foreclosed). § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 4:14-cv-00206 MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On August 25, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that the United States of America’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 30) be GRANTED and that the Final Default Judgment attached to Plaintiff’s motion, see Dkt. 30-2, be entered for Plaintiff. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the 1 Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, the United States of America’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. 30) is GRANTED and a final default judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 31st day of March, 2015. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?