Flower Mound Dermatology, P.A. v. Nicole Reed Medical, PLLC et al
Filing
57
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 38 Motion to Dismiss filed by Google Inc, 49 Report and Recommendations. Google, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint [Doc. #38] is DENIED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 12/5/14. (cm, )
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
FLOWER MOUND DERMATOLOGY,
P.A.,
Plaintiff,
V.
NICOLE REED MEDICAL, PLLC d/b/a
CENTER FOR DERMATOLOGY AND
COSMETIC LASER SURGERY and
d/b/a DERMATOLOGY CENTER OF
PLANO; ROBERT SELKIN; BRYAN
SELKIN; GILBERT SELKIN; and
GOOGLE, INC.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:14cv280
Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636. On October 6, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Google, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Second Amended Complaint [Doc. #38] be denied.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the court.
1
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Google, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second
Amended Complaint [Doc. #38] is DENIED.
So ordered and signed on
Dec 5, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?