SPC Land Trust V Bank of America, N.A., et al
Filing
11
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL for 5 Motion to Strike, Motion to Dismiss and 6 Motion to Dismiss filed by SPC Land Trust. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/31/2015. (pad, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
SPC LAND TRUST,
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Plaintiff,
VS.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ET AL.,
Defendants.
Case No. 4:14cv341
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On August 18, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Complaint (Dkt. 6) be
GRANTED, that Defendants’ Motion to Strike Complaint or in the Alternative Motion to Extend
Deadline to File Responsive Pleading (Dkt. 5) be DENIED as moot, and that this case be dismissed
with prejudice.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions
of the court. Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Complaint (Dkt. 6) is GRANTED, and Defendants’ Motion
to Strike Complaint or in the Alternative Motion to Extend Deadline to File Responsive Pleading
(Dkt. 5) is DENIED as moot.
1
This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice and the matter is closed on the court’s docket
with each party bearing its own costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
.
SIGNED this the 31st day of March, 2015.
_______________________________
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?