Cannedy et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Report and Recommendations, 7 Motion to Remand filed by Carla Jo Cannedy, Steven Quinton Cannedy, Motions terminated: 7 Opposed MOTION to Remand filed by Carla Jo Cannedy, Steven Quinton Cannedy.This case is dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 3/31/2015. (snh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
STEVEN QUINTON CANNEDY
and CARLA JO CANNEDY
WELLS FARGO BANK,
and CHRISTIAN CLAUDIO
Case No. 4:14CV391
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636. On September 17, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Dkt. 7) be DENIED as
MOOT and that Plaintiffs’ claims be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations as the findings and
conclusions of the court. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Dkt. 7) is DENIED as MOOT
and this case is dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this the 31st day of March, 2015.
RICHARD A. SCHELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?