Williams v. USA
Filing
7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 3 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED without prejudice. All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 12/18/2014. (kls, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
PAUL DANA WILLIAMS,
#07339-051
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
§
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:14-CV-468
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:91-CR-34(1)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the motion to vacate,
set aside, or correct his sentence filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be dismissed without
prejudice. Movant has filed objections.
The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains his proposed findings of fact and
recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having
made a de novo review of the objections raised by Movant to the Report, the Court is of the opinion
that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections of Movant
are without merit. It is accordingly
ORDERED that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in
Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED without prejudice. All motions
by either .
party not previously ruled upon are DENIED.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 18th day of December, 2014.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?