Inge v. Urban Settlement Services et al
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Henry Peyton Inge, 25 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion to Remand [Doc. #19] is GRANTED, and this case is remanded to the 362nd District Court of Denton County, Texas.All motions by either party not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 12/5/14. (cm, )
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
HENRY PEYTON INGE,
Plaintiff,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BRICE
VANDER LINDEN & WERNICK,
P.C., AND BOFA MERRILL
LYNCH ASSET HOLDINGS, INC.,
URBAN LENDING SOLUTIONS,
U.P., LLC, AND BAC HOME
LOANS SERVICING, L.P.,
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case No. 4:14cv548
(Judge Clark/Judge Mazzant)
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 636. On October 29, 2014, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Doc. #19] be
granted and the case remanded to the 362nd District Court of Denton County, Texas.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the court.
1
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand [Doc. #19] is
GRANTED, and this case is remanded to the 362nd District Court of Denton County, Texas.
All motions by either party not previously ruled on are DENIED.
So ordered and signed on
Dec 5, 2014
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?