Kerr et al v. Target Corporation et al
Filing
16
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - DENYING 8 Motion to Remand, filed by Jonhedward Lewis Kerr, Bobbie T Kerr, 14 Report and Recommendations. It is further ORDERED Plaintiffs' claims against Andrea D. Rudd are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 5/11/2015. (baf, )
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
BOBBIE T. KERR and JOHNEDWARD
LEWIS KERR
Plaintiffs,
V.
TARGET CORPORATION, ET AL.
Defendants.
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:15cv13
Chief Judge Clark/Judge Craven
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this
matter having been referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On
April 14, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered, containing proposed findings of fact
and recommendations that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [Doc. #8] be granted and that Plaintiffs’
claims against Andrea D. Pool a/k/a Andrea D. Rudd be dismissed.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the
Court. It is therefore
ORDERED Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand [Doc. #8] is DENIED. It is further
ORDERED Plaintiffs’ claims against Andrea D. Rudd are DISMISSED.
So ORDERED and SIGNED this 11 day of May, 2015.
___________________________________
Ron Clark, United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?