Muniz v. USA

Filing 5

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 4 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Hector Dario Muniz's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED without prejudice as moot. All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 7/29/2015. (kls, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT HECTOR DARIO MUNIZ, #21005-078 versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:15-CV-290 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:13CR00103-002 ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Hector Dario Muniz’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be dismissed without prejudice as moot. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that Hector Dario Muniz’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED without prejudice as moot. . All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 29th day of July, 2015. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?