Wilson v. CMC Home Lending et al

Filing 20

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 10 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 17 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #10) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., are DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendant CMC Home Lending are DISMISSED without prejudice. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE the civil action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/15/2015. (kls, )

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION

JAMES WILSON
V.
CMC HOME LENDING and WELLS
FARGO BANK, N.A.

§
§
§
§
§
§

CASE NO. 4:15-CV-304
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On October 15, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered (Dkt. #17) containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s
Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #10) be granted. Moreover, on that same date, the Magistrate Judge
also entered a Notice of Impending Dismissal (Dkt. #16), notifying Plaintiff that this action shall
be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining Defendant CMC Home Lending, in
accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The Court further notified Plaintiff that
failure to respond would result in dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge regarding Defendant Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #10), and no objections thereto having been timely filed,
this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct
and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Court
finds that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. should be dismissed. Further, having received no
response to the Court’s notice of impending dismissal (Dkt. #16), the Court further finds

Defendant CMC Home Lending should also be dismissed without prejudice for failure to
prosecute.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #10) is
GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. are DISMISSED
with prejudice.
If is further ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant CMC Home Lending

.

are DISMISSED without prejudice.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil
action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 15th day of December, 2015.

___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2