Housley v. PNC Mortgage, a division of PNC Bank, N.A., successor by merger to National City Bank
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 15 Report and Recommendation, 3 Motion to Dismiss filed by PNC Mortgage, a division of PNC Bank, N.A., successor by merger to National City Bank. It is, th erefore, ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #3) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/17/2015. (kls, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
ERIKA B. HOUSLEY
V.
PNC MORTGAGE, A DIVISION OF PNC
BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER
TO NATIONAL CITY BANK
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
CASE NO. 4:15-CV-393
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On October 15, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered (Dkt. #15) containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #3) be
granted.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having
been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the
Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #3) is GRANTED
.
and Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil
action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 17th day of November, 2015.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?