United States of America v. 2007 Chevrolet Tahoe, VIN: 1GNFC13017R283721

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - GRANTING 8 Motion for Entry of Default filed by United States of America, 10 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Ron Clark on 12/23/2015. (baf, )

Download PDF
**NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2007 CHEVROLET TAHOE VIN 1GNFC13017R283721 § § § § § § NO. 4:15cv500 (Judge Clark/Judge Bush) ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On November 6, 2015, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. # 8) should be GRANTED, that a judgment of forfeiture be entered in favor of the United States, that all right, title, and interest in the Defendant property should be vested in the United States, and that the Defendant property should be disposed of according to law. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations as the findings and conclusions of the court. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. # 8) is GRANTED and a judgment of forfeiture shall be entered in favor of the United States. So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23 day of December, 2015. ___________________________________ Ron Clark, United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?