UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Anderton

Filing 16

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 14 Report and Recommendations, 13 Motion for Default Judgment filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff United States of Americas Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #13) is GRANTED and a final default judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 3/2/17. (cm, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION § § § § § UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WELDON R. ANDERTON Civil Action No. 4:15-CV-655 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 20, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #14) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff United States of America’s (the “Plaintiff” or “Government”) Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #13) be granted, and that final judgment be entered for Plaintiff in the amount claimed. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and . conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff United States of America’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #13) is GRANTED and a final default judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 2nd day of March, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?