Modjbafan v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, for 18 Report and Recommendation, 13 Motion to Dismiss filed by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 13) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 12/30/2016. (kls, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
§ Civil Action No. 4:15-CV-683
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On November 18, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #18) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction under Rule
12(b)(1) and Failure to State a Claim under Rule 12(b)(6) (“Motion to Dismiss”) (Dkt. #13) be
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. # 13) is
GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 30th day of December, 2016.
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?