Morris v. Copart

Filing 72

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 69 Report and Recommendations. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Cour t is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 1/9/2017. (daj, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION GEORGE MORRIS v. V4V1 VEHICLES FOR VETERANS § § Civil Action No. 4:15-CV-724 § (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) § § MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On December 7, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #69) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to properly serve the remaining Defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the . Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 9th day of January, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?