SHUBERT v. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC. et al

Filing 53

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 52 Report and Recommendations. The entirety of Plaintiffs claims against Defendants are dismissed. Costs are taxed against the party incurring the same. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/2/17. (cm, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION THOMAS SHUBERT, § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-00064-ALM § JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON § § § § § § § § § § Plaintiff, v. JOHN/JANE DOE 1-20, (FICTITIOUS INDIVIDUALS, PARTNERSHIPS, CORPORATIONS AND/OR OTHER BUSINESS ENTITIES) JOINTLY, SEVERALLY AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE; Defendants. MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, the matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 18, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #52) was entered containing a recommendation that Plaintiff’s remaining claims against John/Jane Doe Defendants be dismissed. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the entirety of Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants are dismissed. Costs are taxed against the party incurring the same. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. 1 . The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 2nd day of June, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?