Lander et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al

Filing 79

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, 61 Report and Recommendations for 30 Plaintiffs' Motion of Augmentation to Plaintiffs' First Amended Motion to Remand, filed by Peter E. Lander, The Estate of Mimi J. Lander, 28 First Amended Motion to Remand filed by Peter E. Lander, 20 Motion to Remand filed by Peter E. Lander, The Estate of Mimi J. Lander, 29 Plaintiffs' Motion Challenging Removal and Jurisdiction, filed by Pet er E. Lander, The Estate of Mimi J. Lander. ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (Dkt. #20), Plaintiffs' First Amended Motion to Remand (Dkt. #28), Plaintiffs' Motion Challenging Removal and Jurisdiction (Dkt. #29), and Plaintiffs' Motion of Augmentation to Plaintiffs' First Amended Motion to Remand (Dkt. #30) are DENIED.. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/7/2016. (kls, )

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION

PETER E. LANDER, THE ESTATE OF
MIMI J. LANDER,

v.
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.

§
§
§ Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-116
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
§
§
§

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On September 8, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #61) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiffs Peter E. Lander’s and the Estate of
Mimi J. Lander’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion to Remand (Dkt. #20), Plaintiffs’ First Amended Motion
to Remand (Dkt. #28), Plaintiffs’ Motion Challenging Removal and Jurisdiction (Dkt. #29), and
Plaintiffs’ Motion of Augmentation to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Motion to Remand (Dkt. #30)
be denied.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having
been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate
Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the
Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand (Dkt. #20), Plaintiffs’ First
Amended Motion to Remand (Dkt. #28), Plaintiffs’ Motion Challenging Removal and

.
Jurisdiction (Dkt. #29), and Plaintiffs’ Motion of Augmentation to Plaintiffs’ First Amended
Motion to Remand (Dkt. #30) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this 7th day of October, 2016.

___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2