Zamora et al v. Ryland Mortgage Company et al
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, for 12 Motion to Dismiss filed by Caliber Home Loans, Inc., 13 Report and Recommendation. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Caliber Home Loans, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss under Rule 41(b) (Dkt. #12) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Caliber Home Loans, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/26/2016. (kls, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
ROSIE ZAMORA, MARCO ZAMORA,
v.
RYLAND MORTGAGE COMPANY,
BANK OF AMERICA, CALIBER HOME
LOANS, INC., HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT.
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-170
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
§
§
§
§
§
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On September 26, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #13) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Caliber Home Loans, Inc.’s
Motion to Dismiss under Rule 41(b) (Dkt. #12) be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Caliber Home Loans, Inc.’s Motion to
Dismiss under Rule 41(b) (Dkt. #12) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant
Caliber Home Loans, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 26th day of October, 2016.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?