Luper v. Director, TDCJ-CID

Filing 19

ORDER OF DIMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 8 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/7/2017. (daj, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER ALAN LUPER, #1879581 VS. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16cv365 ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Don D. Bush, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed with prejudice as untimely filed. Petitioner filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Petitioner to the Report, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct. Petitioner fails to show he timely filed his petition or that equitable tolling is warranted. Thus, the Court adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate . Judge as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. SIGNED this 7th day of February, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?