Cox v. USA

Filing 7

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 6 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Dkt. #1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is GRANTED to the extent that the sentence imposed in Criminal Action Number 4:06cr84(1) is VACATED, and Movant shall be resentenced. All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 11/10/2016. (kls, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION RICKY RYAN COX, #13228-078 VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16cv419 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:06cr84(1) MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Movant should be resentenced according to Johnson v. United States, — U.S. —, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015). The Report and Recommendation, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration, and no objections having been timely filed, the court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings and conclusions of the court. It is accordingly ORDERED that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Dkt. #1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is GRANTED to the extent that the sentence imposed in Criminal Action Number 4:06cr84(1) is VACATED, and Movant shall be resentenced. All motions by either party not previously ruled upon are DENIED. . SIGNED this the 10th day of November, 2016. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?