Taylor v. USA
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, for 5 Report and Recommendation. ORDERED that Movant Richard Keith Taylor's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct a Sentence by a Person in Federa l Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is GRANTED tot he extent that the sentence imposed in Criminal Action Number 4:08CR0001 6-001 is VACATED, and Movant shall be resentenced. All other motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Marcia A. Crone on 9/19/2016. (kls, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
RICHARD KEITH TAYLOR, #15234-078
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-430
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:08CR00016-001
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge Don D. Bush, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Movant Richard
Keith Taylor should be resentenced, in accordance with Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551
(2015). The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed
findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for
consideration, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that
the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and adopts same as the findings
and conclusions of the Court. It is accordingly
ORDERED that Movant Richard Keith Taylor’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct
a Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is GRANTED to
the extent that the sentence imposed in Criminal Action Number 4:08CR00016-001 is VACATED,
and Movant shall be resentenced. All other motions not previously ruled on are DENIED.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 19th day of September, 2016.
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?