Wilmington Trust, National Association v. Harris
Filing
32
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 31 Report and Recommendations, ORDER re 21 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Lillie Ruth Harris filed by U.S. Bank National Association. Defendants Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #31) is DENIED AS MOOT and the Clerks Entry of Default (Dkt. #22) should be and hereby is set aside. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/17/2017. (cm, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
AS LEGAL TRUSTEE FOR TRUMAN
2016 SC6 TITLE TRUST
v.
LILLIE RUTH HARRIS
§
§ Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-498
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
§
§
§
§
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On September 29, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #31) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant’s Motion for Default Judgment be
denied as moot (Dkt. #21), and further that the Clerk’s Entry of Default be set aside (Dkt. #22).
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been
timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #31) is
.
DENIED AS MOOT and the Clerk’s Entry of Default (Dkt. #22) should be and hereby is set
aside.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 17th day of October, 2017.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?