Stanford v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al

Filing 38

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 33 Report and Recommendations 13 Motion to Dismiss filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Dkt. #13) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/21/17. (cm, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION FLORIDA SUNSHINE STANFORD v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-510 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 31, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #33) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. #13) be denied. Having received the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings . and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. #13) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 21st day of February, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?