Stanford v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 33 Report and Recommendations 13 Motion to Dismiss filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association. Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Amended Complaint (Dkt. #13) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 2/21/17. (cm, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
FLORIDA SUNSHINE STANFORD
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, CALIBER HOME
LOANS, INC., U.S. BANK TRUST, N.A.,
AS TRUSTEE FOR LSF9 MASTER
PARTICIPATION TRUST
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-510
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On January 31, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #33) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s
Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. #13) be denied.
Having received the report and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings
.
and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s Motion to
Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (Dkt. #13) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 21st day of February, 2017.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?