Ridge, III v. Home Service Club Warranty Corporation
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 17 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Home Service Club Warranty Corporation's Motion to Dismiss with Supporting Brief (Dkt. #8) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 11/28/2016. (daj, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
HARRY W. RIDGE, III,
v.
HOME SERVICE CLUB WARRANTY
CORPORATION.
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-570
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
§
§
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On October 28, 2016, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #17) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Home Service Club Warranty
Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss with Supporting Brief (Dkt. #8) be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Home Service Club Warranty Corporation’s
Motion to Dismiss with Supporting Brief (Dkt. #8) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims are
DISMISSED without prejudice.
.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil
action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 28th day of November, 2016.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?