Schoch v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 37 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 11 ; Dkt. 29 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and that the entirety of Plaintiff's claims for injunctive relief and any claim asserted under 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(a) are hereby dismissed. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/26/2017. (baf, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
DORRIAN JEROME SCHOCH
v.
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE,
WELLS FARGO BANK NA
§
§
§
§
§
Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-619
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On April 11, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #37) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss
(Dkt. #11; Dkt. #29) be granted in part and denied in part.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been
timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s Motion to Dismiss
.
(Dkt. #11; Dkt. #29) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and that the entirety of
Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief and any claim asserted under 15 U.S.C. § 1681s-2(a) are
hereby dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 26th day of May, 2017.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?