Curry v. The Bank of New York Mellon
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 14 Final MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The Bank of New York Mellon, 33 Report and Recommendations. Defendants Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Dkt. #14) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/25/17. (cm, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
BRENDA D. CURRY,
v.
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
F/K/A THE BANK OF NEW YORK, AS
TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDERS CWABS, INC., ASSETBACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIS 2006-9
§
§
§ CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-00654
§ (JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON)
§
§
§
§
§
§
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On July 2, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #33) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Dkt.
#14) be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Final Summary Judgment (Dkt.
#14) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 25th day of July, 2017.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?