Dawson v. USA
Filing
15
ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge for 13 Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#6) is DISMISSED wit hout prejudice. It is further ORDERED the Clerk close Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-749 as improvidently filed, and file Movant's motion (#1) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in his criminal case, Criminal Action No. 4:15-CR-9(1). All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 11/27/2017. (daj, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
GLEN TERRY DAWSON, #22910-078
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
§
§
§
§
§
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16cv749
CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:15cr9(1)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate
Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge,
which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action,
has been presented for consideration. No objections have been filed. After reviewing the Report
and Recommendation, the Court concludes the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct, and adopts the same as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
It is therefore ORDERED the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a
Person in Federal Custody (#6) is DISMISSED without prejudice.
It is further ORDERED the Clerk close Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-749 as improvidently
filed, and file Movant’s motion (#1) pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) in his criminal case,
Criminal Action No. 4:15-CR-9(1). All motions by either party not previously ruled on are hereby
.
DENIED.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004.
SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 27th day of November, 2017.
________________________________________
MARCIA A. CRONE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?