Glatfelter v. City of Paris et al

Filing 25

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 14 Motion to Dismiss, 13 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction. All relief not previously granted is denied. The Clerk is directed to Close this action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/30/2017. (pad, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION GROVER GLATFELTER, v. CITY OF PARIS, PARIS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, § § § Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-00938 § (Judge Mazzant/Judge Johnson) § § § MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 31, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #22) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant City of Paris’ (“Paris”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #13) and Defendant Paris Economic Development Corporation’s (“PEDC”) Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #14) be granted. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendant Paris’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #13) and Defendant PEDC’s Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #14) are GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. IT IS SO ORDERED. SIGNED this 30th day of June, 2017. ___________________________________ AMOS L. MAZZANT UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?