Slocum et al v. U.S. Bank National Association et al

Filing 30

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 25 Report and Recommendations,, 18 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, America's Servicing Company, U.S. Bank National Association. Defendants motion (Dkt. #18) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. Signed by Judge Richard A. Schell on 6/16/17. (cm, )

Download PDF
United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ALLISON SLOCUM AND GARY SLOCUM, v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL., § § § § § § § § Civil Action No. 4:16-CV-00955 (Judge Mazzant/Judge Johnson) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 23, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #25) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. #18) be granted. Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, this Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Defendants’ motion (Dkt. #18) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. IT IS SO ORDERED. . SIGNED this the 16th day of June, 2017. _______________________________ RICHARD A. SCHELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?