Becton et al v. McKinney City of et al

Filing 117

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - GRANTING 111 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b) filed by Keith "Skip" Davis, Craig Ranch Community Association, Capital Consultants Managem ent Corporation, 114 Report and Recommendations. A final judgment is entered as to these Defendants only, and Plaintiffs shall take nothingfrom their claims against Defendants Davis, CCMC, and CCRA. Signed by District Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 5/7/2018. (baf, )

United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION

D.B., BY AND THROUGH NEXT FRIEND,
SHASHONA BECTON;
v.
THE CITY OF MCKINNEY, TEXAS, ET
AL.,

§
§
§
§
§
§
§

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:16-CV-00965
JUDGE MAZZANT/JUDGE JOHNSON

MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this
action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the United States Magistrate Judge
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On January 18, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge was
entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations (see Dkt. #114) that
Defendants Keith Davis (“Davis”), Capital Consultants Management Corporation (“CCMC”),
and Craig Ranch Community Association’s (“CRCA”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Unopposed
Motion for Entry of Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) (Dkt. #111) should be granted.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions
of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
Pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, there is no just reason
for delay in the entry of a separate final judgment with respect to Defendants Davis, CCMC,
and CCRA, these Defendants having been dismissed with prejudice by this Court’s Orders of
January 8, 2018. See Dkts. #109, #110.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
Defendants Davis, CCMC. and CCRA’s Unopposed Motion for Entry of Final Judgment
. Pursuant to Rule 54(b) (Dkt. #111) is GRANTED.

A final judgment is entered as to these Defendants only, and Plaintiffs shall take nothing
from their claims against Defendants Davis, CCMC, and CCRA .
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 7th day of May, 2018.

___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2