Robert Peterson v. Bank of America NA
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE - GRANTING 13 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Bank of America, N.A., 51 Order, Terminate Motions, Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/10/2017. (baf, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
ROBERT PETERSON, AS TRUSTEE FOR
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Case No. 4:16CV982
Judge Mazzant/Judge Johnson
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On September 11, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #51) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Defendant Bank of America, N.A.’s
(“Defendant”) Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #13) be GRANTED.
Wade Kricken (“Kricken”), counsel for Plaintiff Robert Peterson, as Trustee for
Prestonwood Trust (“Plaintiff”), and Reedy Spigner (“Spigner”), counsel for Prestonwood Trust,
a non-party, filed responses to the Magistrate Judge’s report. See Dkt. #52 and #53. However, both
responses relate only to the Magistrate Judge’s Order granting Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions
(Dkt. #47), and do not state any objections to the Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions
regarding Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #13).
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections regarding the issue
of summary judgment having been filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and
conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the
findings and conclusions of the Court on the issue of summary judgment. Therefore, Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. #13) is GRANTED.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 10th day of October, 2017.
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?