Cunningham v. Careington International Corporation
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 36 Report and Recommendations, Order, 35 MOTION to Dismiss ALL DEFENDANTS filed by Craig Cunningham. The entirety of Plaintiff Craig Cunningham's claims against all Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Costs are taxed against the party incurring same. All relief not previously granted is hereby DENIED. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 10/10/2017. (rpc, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPORATION, ET AL.,
Case No. 4:17-cv-00040
(Judge Mazzant/Judge Johnson)
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On September 20, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #36) was entered containing
proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Without
Prejudice (Dkt. 35) should be GRANTED.
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections
thereto having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of
the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court. Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Without Prejudice (Dkt. #35)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the entirety of
Plaintiff Craig Cunningham’s claims against all Defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
Costs are taxed against the party incurring same. All relief not previously granted is
hereby DENIED, and the Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action.
It is SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 10th day of October, 2017.
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?