Gharib v. USA

Filing 14

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 12 Report and Recommendations. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#1) p ursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED, and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions by either party not. previously ruled upon are DENIED. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 2/4/2019. (daj, )

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CYRUS GHARIB, #27652-177 versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS § § § § § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-56 CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4:14-CR-53(01) ORDER OF DISMISSAL The above-entitled and numbered civil action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, who issued a Report and Recommendation concluding that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should be denied. Movant has filed objections. The Report of the Magistrate Judge, which contains proposed findings of fact and recommendations for the disposition of such action, has been presented for consideration. Having made a de novo review of the objections raised by Movant to the Report, the Court concludes that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the objections of Movant are without merit. It is accordingly ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (#1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED, and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. All motions by either party not. previously ruled upon are DENIED. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 7th day of September, 2004. SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 4th day of February, 2019. ________________________________________ MARCIA A. CRONE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?