Wang v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana et al
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 27 Report and Recommendations, 16 Motion to Remand to State Court filed by Max Wang. Plaintiff Max Wangs Motion to Remand (Dkt. #16) is DENIED, and that Plaintiffs claims against non-diverse Defendant Sean F. Smith are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 6/20/17. (cm, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
MAX WANG
v.
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF
INDIANA, SEAN SMITH
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-158
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
§
§
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On June 2, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #27) was entered containing proposed
findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff Max Wang’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. #16) be
denied.
Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been
timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge
are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and conclusions of the Court.
.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff Max Wang’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. #16) is
DENIED, and that Plaintiff’s claims against non-diverse Defendant Sean F. Smith are dismissed
without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 20th day of June, 2017.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?