Hutchings v. Sam Rayburn Memorial Veterans Center Skilled Nursing, et al
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE for 22 Report and Recommendations. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil action. Signed by Judge Amos L. Mazzant, III on 7/10/2017. (baf, )
United States District Court
EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
SHERMAN DIVISION
BYRON KEITH HUTCHINGS, HEIR AT
LAW AND ON BEHALF OF ALL
WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES
OF THE ESTATE OF BILLY GENE
HUTCHINGS
v.
SAM RAYBURN MEMORIAL
VETERANS CENTER SKILLED
NURSING, ET AL.
§
§
§
§
§ Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-210
§ (Judge Mazzant/Judge Nowak)
§
§
§
§
MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action,
this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636.
On June 8, 2017, the report of the Magistrate Judge was entered containing proposed findings of
fact and recommendations that Plaintiff’s case be dismissed without prejudice for want of
prosecution and failure to obey an order (Dkt. #22).
Having received the report of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto
having been timely filed, the Court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the
Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge’s report as the findings and
conclusions of the Court.
It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff’s case is DISMISSED without prejudice.
.
All relief not previously granted is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this civil
action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
SIGNED this 10th day of July, 2017.
___________________________________
AMOS L. MAZZANT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?